John Le Carre
This short book is instructive and a delight to read.
1. For writers who have wondered about the differences between detective stories and espionage tales, this story, having both, is an example.
2. For writing wondering how much dialogue to put into a story and where, this story presents dialogue judiciously well. There are no frills. The dialogue advances the story.
3. Writers wondering about description by using adjectives, a phrase or a prepositional phrase, the scenery and the characters are further developed by description.
This writing advances each story well until the stories break into their constituent parts. It seems like a free for all, except bad guys (or spies) are identified or caught and the success of the espionage is identified and analyzed.
The story revolves around the death of a British civil servant who is identified as a possible security risk. An interview with George Smiley causes his East German handlers to kill the civil servant and everyone else associated with him. Murder is committed to insure security (espionage) but some of the acts are unnecessary and criminal. Not much is investigated about each course. Smiley predicts who will be the next victims. I suppose the story does not need Smiley’s report to his superiors in the last chapter: It is a reminder that espionage is a dangerous business.